Mutational scanning of CRX classifies clinical variants and reveals biochemical properties of the transcriptional effector domain

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Experimental overview of the CRX deep mutational scan. (A) Known CRX domains, sequence conservation, predicted disorder, and reported ClinVar missense variants. Per-residue conservation was computed using sequences from the UniProt UniRef50 cluster derived from human CRX. Disorder predicted with Metapredict (Emenecker et al. 2021). Missense pathogenic variants (“Pathogenic” and/or “Likely pathogenic”) and benign variants (“Benign” and/or “Likely Benign”) from ClinVar (accessed June 2024); height of bar proportional to number of variants at each position (max = 3). (B) Schematic of the CRX deep mutational scan. A clonal cell line carrying a CRX-responsive fluorescent reporter and genomic landing pad (LP) was generated, and a library of CRX variants was integrated into the LP so that each cell expresses a single variant. Following fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), sequencing was used to determine relative variant barcode abundances in each fluorescence bin, allowing for the calculation of a reporter activity score. (C) LP cells integrated with a 1:1 ratio of plasmids carrying mEmerald (green; arbitrary units) or mCherry2 (red; arbitrary units), with or without a plasmid expressing Cre recombinase (60,000 cells plotted per condition, points shaded by density, percent of cells falling within the indicated gates shown). (D) Reporter activation (green fluorescence; arbitrary units) was measured in Reporter + LP cells with the indicated CRX variants integrated. Two independent biological replicate experiments per sample (distributions plotted from 40,000 cells).

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 34: 1540-1552

Preprint Server