Genomic analysis of Rad26 and Rad1–Rad10 reveals differences in their dependence on Mediator and RNA polymerase II

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Rad1, Rad10, and Rad26 coimmunoprecipitate with Mediator, and the loss of Mediator head in the med17-138 mutant decreases Rad10 chromatin binding. (AD) Co-IP between Rad1, Rad10, and Rad26 and Mediator. Inputs are shown in right panels. (A) Mediator was immunoprecipitated from crude yeast extracts via Med17-Myc subunit with α-Myc antibody (IP), and western blotting with α-HA antibody detected HA-Rad26 (Co-IP). (BD) HA-Rad1 (B) or Rad10-Flag (C,D) was immunoprecipitated with α-HA or α-Flag antibody, respectively, and analyzed by western blotting with α-Myc antibody (B,C) against Med17-Myc subunit or rabbit polyclonal α-Med17 antibody (D) to detect the Med17 (Mediator) subunit (Co-IP) (left panels). WT (AD) or rad2Δ (D) strains were used. IgG indicates a control immunoprecipitation with IgG magnetic beads only (A,B). A strain carrying nontagged Rad10 was used as a negative control in C and D. (EH) Effect of the med17-138 mutation on Rad10, Rad26, and Pol II occupancies at selected regions. Quantitative ChIP assays were performed using α-Rpb1 antibody (Pol II) (F,H), and α-HA antibody against Rad10-HA (E) or HA-Rad26 (G). Cells were grown in selective SD medium complemented with amino acids at 25°C and then shifted for 45 min at 37°C. GAL1-O amplicon was used as a negative control. Quantities were normalized to qPCR performed on input DNA and are expressed as a percentage. The indicated value is the mean of three biological replicates, and error bars represent the standard deviation.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 32: 1516-1528

Preprint Server