Genome-wide variability in recombination activity is associated with meiotic chromatin organization

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Proposed framework relating mammalian meiotic chromosomal architecture and recombination. (A) Contact probability versus genomic distance analysis of zygonema Hi-C data set. Orange and blue arrows indicate estimate of loop length for A- and B-compartments, respectively, determined as the maxima of the derivatives of the P(s) curves as in Gassler et al. (2017). (B) Simplified cartoon of proposed chromatin conformation. In early leptonema, meiotic chromosomes adopt a brush-loop architecture, with cohesin and recombination machinery located at the axis. Loops in the A-compartment have, on average, fewer base pairs than the B-compartment. Accordingly, A- and B-compartment regions depicted here represent roughly equal genomic lengths despite greater number of A-compartment loops. Physical size of A- and B-compartment loops may remain comparable owing to the relaxed linear packing density in A-compartment. (C) Concurrently during leptonema, PRDM9 binds across both A- and B-compartment regions, causing local increases in chromatin activity and spatial accessibility. Schematic depicts hypothetical example of 10 total binding events across the A- and B-compartment regions. After PRDM9 binding, a subset of binding loci are recruited to DSB machinery at the axis and form DSBs. This subset is biased toward A-compartment. Later during pachynema, a single crossover point is selected from the DSBs formed earlier, avoiding DSBs formed in gene-body regions.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 31: 1561-1572

Preprint Server