KDM1A maintains genome-wide homeostasis of transcriptional enhancers

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Loss of KDM1A but not KDM5C results in aberrant activation of enhancers. (A) Fractions of intergenic enhancers bound by KDM1A and/or KDM5C in mESCs. (B,C) Volcano plots of GRO-seq signals at enhancers bound by both KDM1A and KDM5C from DESeq analyses. Whereas the loss of KDM1A resulted in a large-scale increase in GRO-seq signals at enhancers, the deletion of KDM5C had a minimal impact. The x-axis and y-axis indicate the log2 fold-change and significance, respectively, of differential expression in WT and mutant mESC lines. (D) Scatterplots of GRO-seq levels at KDM1A-bound poised, intermediate, and active enhancers. Significantly up-regulated and down-regulated enhancers (q < 0.05, DESeq) are shown in blue and orange, respectively. The LOWESS curve for each class of enhancers is shown in red. The total number (n) of all, significantly up-regulated, and significantly down-regulated enhancers in each group are indicated in black, blue, and orange, respectively. Each class of enhancers shows a significant up-regulation (P < 2.2−16, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) in Kdm1a-GT mESCs compared with WT mESCs. (E) Western blot analysis to validate the re-expression of KDM1A-WT or the hypomorphic K661A mutant after inducible Kdm1a-KO in mESCs. (F) eRNA levels measured using RT-qPCR. Mean ± SEM (n = 4 biological replicates). (*) P < 0.05; Student's t-test, (n.s.) not significant. See Supplemental Table S4 for details of the enhancers.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 31: 186-197

Preprint Server