Genome-wide cancer-specific chromatin accessibility patterns derived from archival processed xenograft tumors

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Nanodroplets facilitate the extraction of chromatin from archival tissue. Percent soluble chromatin from one 10-µm section of UM-RC-2 (A), EWS894 (B), and MDA-MB-231 (C) following sonication with (solid) or without (dashed line) for indicated. (D) FAIRE-qPCR was performed on chromatin prepared from EWS894 xenograft tumor tissue with a commercial FFPE chromatin preparation kit (eight 10-µm sections, gray bars) or with nanodroplets (one 10-µm section, black bars). The y-axis indicates the percent FAIRE signal compared to input signal by qPCR. (Open) regions of known accessible chromatin; (Closed) regions of known inaccessible chromatin. (EH) Xenograft tumor tissue derived from MCF-7 cells was fixed for 6 h (E), 24 h (F), or 48 h (G), and one, 10-μm section of each was deparaffinized, rehydrated, and sonicated with (solid line) or without (dashed line) nanodroplets for indicated time (x-axis, minutes). Percent soluble chromatin (y-axis) was measured by comparing the quantity of DNA in the soluble fraction to that of the insoluble pellet fraction. (H) FAIRE-qPCR was performed on one, 10-µm tissue section sonicated for 8 min with nanodroplets for each fixation time point. The y-axis indicates the percent FAIRE signal compared to input signal by qPCR. (Open) regions of known accessible chromatin; (Closed) regions of known inaccessible chromatin.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 31: 2327-2339

Preprint Server