Single-cell analysis of human embryos reveals diverse patterns of aneuploidy and mosaicism

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Comparisons of aneuploidy across cell types. (A) Individual cells plotted on the first and second UMAP dimensions, colored by cell type annotations from Stirparo et al. (2018). (B) Same as panel A, but for the second and third UMAP dimensions. (C) Cells plotted on the first and second UMAP dimensions, colored by aneuploidy status. (D) Same as panel C, but for the second and third UMAP dimensions. (E) Proportions of aneuploid cells, stratified by cell type. (F) Average marginal effects (AME) of cell types on aneuploidy rates relative to aneuploidy rates of trophectoderm cells—the source for PGT-A biopsies. Confidence intervals of all estimates overlap zero, indicating no significant difference for any cell type.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 30: 814-825

Preprint Server