Genome-wide dynamics of RNA synthesis, processing, and degradation without RNA metabolic labeling

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Validation of INSPEcT− kinetic rates. (A) H2bc6 RNA dynamics quantified in 3T9 mouse fibroblast cells following the acute activation of MYC with (INSPEcT+) and without (INSPEcT−) RNA metabolic labeling. Solid bold lines indicate the model fit; thin solid and dashed lines indicate mean and standard deviation of experimental data for total and premature RNA; dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals for the kinetic rates models. (B) Scatter plots of RNA kinetic rates quantified in untreated 3T9 cells using INSPEcT+ and INSPEcT−. Regression curves and Spearman's correlation coefficients are indicated within each panel. (C) Boxplot of the changes in degradation rates during the differentiation of T cells quantified with INSPEcT−. Rates changes are displayed for m6A+, m6A−, or all RNAs in untreated cells. One-tailed Wilcoxon test P-values are displayed on the top. (D) Temporal changes of the RNA kinetic rates for simulated genes, relative to the initial time point (left), compared with those quantified through INSPEcT+ (middle) and INSPEcT− (right). (E) For each kinetic rate, quantified with or without metabolic labeling data, F1 scores are reported that measure the quality of the classification (P-value cutoff 0.05), considering both precision and recall. Score means and standard deviations are reported based on three simulated data sets obtained at increasing number of time points.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 30: 1492-1507

Preprint Server