ATAC-seq reveals regional differences in enhancer accessibility during the establishment of spatial coordinates in the Drosophila blastoderm

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Elevated accessibility of AP enhancers in tagged domains coincides with their activity. (A) Coverage of 1- to 100-bp ATAC-seq fragments (mean over two replicates) of four selected AP enhancers. Comparison between a whole-embryo control (control: gray), a tagged domain that encompasses the enhancer's activity pattern (IN: blue), and a tagged domain from which the enhancer's activity is excluded (OUT: green). Activity pattern along the AP axis is indicated schematically in dark blue, with color-coded outlines representing positions of respective domains. RNA in situ hybridization images of a reporter gene: gt_(−10) and nub_(+2) (reprinted from Schroeder et al. 2004), Dfd_(−13) (reprinted from Fisher et al. 2012), and Antp_(−16) (reprinted from Kazemian et al. 2010). (B) Violin plots show distribution of log2 fold-changes of ATAC-seq signal (total count of Tn5 transposase cuts, mean over two replicates) between a given tagged domain and its corresponding whole-embryo control, over two classes of AP enhancers: IN (blue) and OUT (green). Asterisks indicate significant differences between IN and OUT enhancers (Student's t-test); (*) P-value < 0.05, (***) P-value < 0.0001. Numbers of enhancers in each class are indicated below individual plots. Domains D3 and D6 are not presented; due to their limited size, none of the AP enhancers had its activity pattern fully included in the domains.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 29: 771-783

Preprint Server