Leveraging chromatin accessibility for transcriptional regulatory network inference in T Helper 17 Cells

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The Th17 TRNs recover key TF–gene interactions from the literature. (AD) Th17 core TRN models. “Core” Th17 genes and TFs were selected from the literature for visual comparison with jp_gene_viz software. Network size was limited to an average of 15 TFs per gene for Inferelator networks using the following: (A) Th17 ATAC prior; (B) no prior; or (D) ChIP + ATAC + KO prior. The edges in Inferelator TRNs are colored according to partial correlation (red indicates positive; blue, negative) and weighted proportionally to edge stability. Solid edges have prior support, whereas dotted edges were learned from gene expression modeling alone. (C) The full KO-ChIP GS from Ciofani et al. (2012), where edge sign is based on differential gene expression analysis between TF KO and control. Nodes are colored according to z-scored gene expression at 48 h in Th17, relative to the other Th cell time points (red/blue indicates increased/decreased expression). The “final” KO + ChIP + ATAC (D) and ATAC-only (B) TRNs max-combine networks built using TF mRNA and prior-based TFA.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 29: 449-463

Preprint Server