Cancer-associated rs6983267 SNP and its accompanying long noncoding RNA CCAT2 induce myeloid malignancies via unique SNP-specific RNA mutations

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Bone marrow cells of CCAT2 mice display exhaustion of hematopoietic stem cells. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of hematopoietic stem cells in MDS- and MPN-like CCAT2 mice compared to WT mice. Cells analyzed include LSK (LinSca1+cKit+) cells; long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs, defined by LincKit+Sca1+CD34loCD135lo population); and short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs, defined by LincKit+Sca1+CD34hiCD135lo population). (B) Flow cytometric analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cells in MDS- and MPN-like CCAT2 mice compared to WT mice. Cells analyzed include common myeloid progenitors (CMPs, LincKit+Sca1−/loCD34+FcγRlo population); granulocyte–macrophage progenitors (GMPs, LincKit+Sca1CD34+FcγR+ population) and megakaryocyte–erythroid progenitors (MEPs, LincKit+Sca1CD34FcγR population). (C) In vitro colony formation assay (left) and in vitro serial replating analysis (right) using bone marrow cells of WT, MDS-, and MPN-like CCAT2 mice. Data are average of three independent experiments done in triplicates. (D,E) Flow cytometry analysis of B cells in different developmental phases (D) and expression of developmental markers Il-7rα and CD79b in pro–pre B cells (E) of CCAT2 mice compared to WT mice. (F) Flow cytometric analysis of T cells in different developmental phases in CCAT2-G and CCAT2-T mice compared to WT mice. Data are represented as mean values ±SEM. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 28: 432-447

Preprint Server