FIND: difFerential chromatin INteractions Detection using a spatial Poisson process

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Existence of the spatial dependency and the idea behind our model. (A) Illustration of the spatial dependency along neighboring loci in the Hi-C contact map. (B) Semivariogram showing the directional variability between interaction bins separated by a certain horizontal and vertical distance in the Hi-C contact map. (C) A differential interaction can be considered as a change of the intensity around the 3D coordinate (i, j, fij) of a reference point μ1. (D) Principle of the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) intensity estimation in a 3×3 window around a pairwise interaction (i, j). Given an interaction (i, j) with a mean frequency Formula in the first condition (represented by the mountain tip in C), if there is no structural change, we expect the interaction frequencies from the second condition to have a similar density around the point μ1 in the 3D space. Thus, for each condition and each replicate, we calculate the 3D distance between each bin in the surrounding window and μ1 and order them according to their distance. We note Formula as the kth-nearest neighbor to the point μ1 from the nth replicate of condition c ∈ {1, 2}. Then, we estimate the density of the KNNs around μ1in the first condition Formula and in the second condition Formula. The density of the KNNs around μ1 is expected to be stable between the two conditions. To decide if the change of the KNN density around μ1 Formula is significantly large or small, we use a Fisher distribution. The same principle applies if we use μ2 (the mean in condition 2) as our reference point.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 28: 412-422

Preprint Server