Enhancer RNA profiling predicts transcription factor activity

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

MD-scores predict TF activity. (A, top) The MD distribution, MD-score, and the number of motifs within 1.5 kb of any eRNA origin before and after stimulation with Nutlin-3a (e.g., Nutlin) on TP53 (Allen et al. 2014), the TF known to be activated. (Bottom) For all motif models (each dot), the change in MD-score (ΔM DS) following perturbation (y-axis) relative to the number of motifs within 1.5 kb of any eRNA origin (x-axis). Red points indicate significantly increased and/or decreased MD-scores, respectively (P-value <10−6). Similar analysis for TNF activation of the NF-κB complex (B) (Luo et al. 2014) and estradiol activation of estrogen receptor (ESR1; C) (Hah et al. 2013). (D) A time series data set following treatment with flavopiridol (Jonkers et al. 2014). The y-axis indicates the MD-score change relative to time point zero. Blue dots indicate a MD-score difference <10−6. A darker shaded line indicates a time trajectory with at least one significant MD-score. (E) Time series data set following treatment with Kdo2-lipid A (KLA) where each time point is normalized to time-matched DMSO (Kaikkonen et al. 2014). Therefore, the y-axis indicates MD-score difference relative to the time point–matched DMSO sample. NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) SRR numbers of these comparisons are outlined in Supplemental Table S4.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 28: 334-344

Preprint Server