Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples

  1. David M. Kingsley1,2
  1. 1Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
  2. 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
  3. 3Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
  4. 4Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
  1. 5 These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • 6 Present address: Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max Planck Society, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

  • Corresponding author: kingsley{at}stanford.edu
  • Abstract

    We present a method to detect copy number variants (CNVs) that are differentially present between two groups of sequenced samples. We use a finite-state transducer where the emitted read depth is conditioned on the mappability and GC-content of all reads that occur at a given base position. In this model, the read depth within a region is a mixture of binomials, which in simulations matches the read depth more closely than the often-used negative binomial distribution. The method analyzes all samples simultaneously, preserving uncertainty as to the breakpoints and magnitude of CNVs present in an individual when it identifies CNVs differentially present between the two groups. We apply this method to identify CNVs that are recurrently associated with postglacial adaptation of marine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to freshwater. We identify 6664 regions of the stickleback genome, totaling 1.7 Mbp, which show consistent copy number differences between marine and freshwater populations. These deletions and duplications affect both protein-coding genes and cis-regulatory elements, including a noncoding intronic telencephalon enhancer of DCHS1. The functions of the genes near or included within the 6664 CNVs are enriched for immunity and muscle development, as well as head and limb morphology. Although freshwater stickleback have repeatedly evolved from marine populations, we show that freshwater stickleback also act as reservoirs for ancient ancestral sequences that are highly conserved among distantly related teleosts, but largely missing from marine stickleback due to recent selective sweeps in marine populations.

    Footnotes

    • Received March 13, 2016.
    • Accepted November 27, 2017.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server