Detecting ancient positive selection in humans using extended lineage sorting

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Effects of background selection. (A) Comparison of the length of ELS regions in simulations of different scenarios. For the distribution under background selection, the s parameter corresponds to the average selection coefficient from the gamma distribution (shape parameter of 0.2). We assumed that the deleterious mutations are recessive with dominance coefficient h = 0.1. The horizontal blue line corresponds to the length cutoff applied to the real data. (B) Distribution of B-scores in the candidate sweep regions (red curve) compared to sets of random regions with matching physical lengths (blue area with dotted blue lines indicating the 95% confidence intervals over 1000 random sets of regions). The lowest B-score (i.e., stronger background selection) was chosen when a region overlapped several B-score annotations.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 27: 1563-1572

Preprint Server