The identification and functional annotation of RNA structures conserved in vertebrates

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

In vitro RNA structure probing in human and mouse shows conserved structure of CRS M1695693. FDR is 11.0% and SI of the nine-species (filtered from the 17-species tree) structural alignment is 48% (45% between human and mouse). The CRS is located between the 3′ UTRs of HOMER2 (minus strand) and WHAMM (plus strand; Chr 15: 8284671–82846804). It overlaps a DNase hypersensitive site (DHS) (ENCODE) and has the typical chromatin signatures of enhancers, namely, enrichment of H3K4me1 and reduced enrichment of H3K4me3, all indicators for a transcribed regulatory region. However, CAGE data from FANTOM5 did not support this hypothesis; instead, poly(A) site clusters (Gruber et al. 2016) suggest an extended 3′ UTR of HOMER2. (A) Genomic tracks. (B) Structure probing results in human and mouse, where red marks base-paired nucleotides (ds), and green and blue mark single-stranded nucleotides (ss). (C) CMfinder's structural alignment, predicted consensus RNA secondary structure, and predicted individual structures in human and mouse as dot-bracket notation. The probing results are overlapped with the in silico predictions by their color code.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 27: 1371-1383

Preprint Server