The logic of transcriptional regulator recruitment architecture at cis-regulatory modules controlling liver functions
- Julie Dubois-Chevalier1,
- Vanessa Dubois1,
- Hélène Dehondt1,
- Parisa Mazrooei2,
- Claire Mazuy1,
- Aurélien A. Sérandour3,
- Céline Gheeraert1,
- Penderia Guillaume1,
- Eric Baugé1,
- Bruno Derudas1,
- Nathalie Hennuyer1,
- Réjane Paumelle1,
- Guillemette Marot4,
- Jason S. Carroll3,
- Mathieu Lupien2,
- Bart Staels1,
- Philippe Lefebvre1,5 and
- Jérôme Eeckhoute1,5
- 1Université Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1011-EGID, F-59000 Lille, France;
- 2The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada;
- 3Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom;
- 4Université Lille, MODAL Team, Inria Lille-Nord Europe, 59650 Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France
- Corresponding author: jerome.eeckhoute{at}inserm.fr
Abstract
Control of gene transcription relies on concomitant regulation by multiple transcriptional regulators (TRs). However, how recruitment of a myriad of TRs is orchestrated at cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) to account for coregulation of specific biological pathways is only partially understood. Here, we have used mouse liver CRMs involved in regulatory activities of the hepatic TR, NR1H4 (FXR; farnesoid X receptor), as our model system to tackle this question. Using integrative cistromic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and interactomic analyses, we reveal a logical organization where trans-regulatory modules (TRMs), which consist of subsets of preferentially and coordinately corecruited TRs, assemble into hierarchical combinations at hepatic CRMs. Different combinations of TRMs add to a core TRM, broadly found across the whole landscape of CRMs, to discriminate promoters from enhancers. These combinations also specify distinct sets of CRM differentially organized along the genome and involved in regulation of either housekeeping/cellular maintenance genes or liver-specific functions. In addition to these TRMs which we define as obligatory, we show that facultative TRMs, such as one comprising core circadian TRs, are further recruited to selective subsets of CRMs to modulate their activities. TRMs transcend TR classification into ubiquitous versus liver-identity factors, as well as TR grouping into functional families. Hence, hierarchical superimpositions of obligatory and facultative TRMs bring about independent transcriptional regulatory inputs defining different sets of CRMs with logical connection to regulation of specific gene sets and biological pathways. Altogether, our study reveals novel principles of concerted transcriptional regulation by multiple TRs at CRMs.
Footnotes
-
↵5 Joint senior authors
-
[Supplemental material is available for this article.]
-
Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.217075.116.
- Received October 18, 2016.
- Accepted April 5, 2017.
This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.











