A flexible method for estimating the fraction of fitness influencing mutations from large sequencing data sets

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Higher burden of nonsynonymous SNVs for proteins at the center versus periphery of protein–protein interaction networks. (A) PPI network of 6700 protein-coding genes with 56,728 significant connections (STRING score >0.7). Each protein is a node and is shaded by the number of interactions (degree). (B) Relationship between the average number of interacting proteins (x-axis) and the degree of connectivity (y-axis) for the PPI network. (C) Relationship between the average number of interacting protein neighbors on estimates of f at nonsynonymous SNVs, showing significantly increased purifying selection on genes located at center rather than periphery of the PPI network. (D) No significant relationship between the average number of interacting proteins on estimates of f at synonymous sites.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 26: 834-843

Preprint Server