Retrotransposition creates sloping shores: a graded influence of hypomethylated CpG islands on flanking CpG sites

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Comparison of DNA methylation at flanking CpGs between empty and filled alleles. (A) Schematic of the empty versus filled alleles and location of primers (arrows). For panels BG, open gray rectangles indicate empty alleles, and closed black diamonds represent filled alleles. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean from three biological replicates. (B,C) HopB1498 flanking CpG methylation in adult liver and testis. Corresponding methylation dot plots are in Supplemental Fig. 4. The distance of each CpG to GFP CGI is marked on the x-axis (5′ and 3′ CpGs are indicated by − and + numbers, respectively). The insertion site is designated by a dashed red line. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01. (D,E) HopB1718 flanking CpG methylation in adult liver and testis. No CpGs were interrogated upstream of the insertion site as it was CpG poor. (F,G) HopB1919 flanking CpG methylation in adult liver and testis.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 25: 1135-1146

Preprint Server