The path to routine use of genomic biomarkers in the cancer clinic

  1. Paul C. Boutros
  1. Informatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto M5G 0A3, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Ontario, Canada
  1. Corresponding author: Paul.Boutros{at}oicr.on.ca

Abstract

It has been almost 15 years since the first microarray-based studies creating multigene biomarkers to subtype and predict survival of cancer patients. This Perspective looks at why only a handful of genomic biomarkers have reached clinical application and what advances are needed over the next 15 years to grow this number. I discuss challenges in creating biomarkers and reproducing them at the genomic and computational levels, including the problem of spatio-genomic heterogeneity in an individual cancer. I then outline the challenges in translating newly discovered genome-wide or regional events, like trinucleotide mutation signatures, kataegis, and chromothripsis, into biomarkers, as well as the importance of incorporating prior biological knowledge. Lastly, I outline the practical problems of pharmaco-economics and adoption: Are new biomarkers viewed as economically rational by potential funders? And if they are, how can their results be communicated effectively to patients and their clinicians? Genomic-based diagnostics have immense potential for transforming the management of cancer. The next 15 years will see a surge of research into the topics here that, when combined with a stream of new targeted therapies being developed, will personalize the cancer clinic.

This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Articles citing this article

| Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

Preprint Server