Enhancer-targeted genome editing selectively blocks innate resistance to oncokinase inhibition

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Integrative epigenomic analysis identifies MITF as a regulator of MET enhancer function. (A) Schematic workflow for the feature overlapper for the chromosomal interval subsets (FOCIS) algorithm. (B) FOCIS feature enrichment for melanocyte lineage-specific DHS at the MET locus. Enrichment for the transcription factor MITF is noted. (C) MITF “Mbox” motif derived from the top 500 MITF-binding sites in ChIP-seq data from primary melanocytes (top, the present study) and from the previously published 47-gene signature (bottom). (D) Characteristics of the lineage-specific enhancer 63 kb downstream from the MET TSS, including the MITF Mbox motif sequence, COLO829 DNase-seq signal, and phastCons vertebrate conservation. (E) Peak-centered heatmap of MITF ChIP-seq signal in primary melanocytes and melanoma cells in the context of inactive (blue) and active (red) BRAF signaling. (F) DNase-seq and MITF ChIP-seq signal at the MET gene TSS and the +63-kb melanocyte lineage-specific enhancer. Normalized ChIP-seq signal is shown on an arbitrary 1–100 scale; ENCODE DNase-seq data shown as F-seq density signal. (G) 3C at the MET locus as a function of BRAF inhibition and MITF depletion in COLO829 melanoma cells. Matched control 3C data from Figure 1E are also shown in this figure for reference.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 24: 751-760

Preprint Server