Cnidarian microRNAs frequently regulate targets by cleavage

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Regulation of miRNA targets and target conservation. (A) Expression of microRNAs and their targets as determined by double in situ hybridization. (B) A scheme showing the structure of the partially duplicated HoxD gene and the position of the two binding sites of miR-2026. (C) The duplicated 3′ UTRs of HoxD in Nematostella (Nv) are very derived, yet the two binding sites of miR-2026 are highly conserved, and both transcript variants are cleaved. The site is also conserved in the sea anemone Metridium senile (Ms). Similarly, the miR-2025 binding site in the coding sequence of the Six3/6 transcript is conserved in Nematostella, Anemonia viridis (Av), and Anthopleura japonica (Aj). In panels B and C, cleavage positions are indicated by an arrow, and ratios of positive clones appear in brackets. (D) Schematic representation of coherent and incoherent circuits involving a transcription factor (TF) that regulates the expression of a miRNA and its targets and the degree of overlap between the expression domains of a miRNA and its targets that would indicate each of the two topologies. (E) miR-2030 and its host/target gene NVE19315 represent a clear case of incoherent regulatory circuit. The precursor of miR-2030 is located in an intron of NVE19315 as indicated by the green arrow. miR-2030 targets two sites in the NVE19315 transcript (indicated by magenta arrows) as supported by the degradome analysis (Site 1) and RLM-RACE (Site 2; cleavage position is indicated by an arrow, and ratios of positive clones appear in brackets).

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 24: 651-663

Preprint Server