Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Propensity of of POLE-exo* Group A mutations to cluster on DNA strands. (A) POLE-exo* context mutations (TCT→TAT and AGA→ATA) were counted in 50-kb windows across POLE-exo* tumors F5-6814, AA-A00N, EI-6917, CA-6718, AA-3555, and A6-6141 from TCGA. Normalized density of TCT→TAT mutations divided by total POLE-exo* context is shown in red, and randomized contexts are shown in blue. POLE-exo* tumors with high mutation rates show enrichment for extreme ratios of TCT→TAT mutations indicating clusters of same-strand mutation within the 50-kb windows. Four of six significantly deviate from random expectation by Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) P-value < 0.05. Two with KS P-value > 0.05 had low mutation frequencies and too few windows available (N) for a valid test (see Methods). (B) POLE-exo* context mutations were paired such that for each mutation, the partner was the next mutation at the indicated minimum genomic distance upstream. The POLE-exo* (CA-6718) tumor showed an enrichment for the same context (TCT→TAT, TCT→TAT or AGA→ATA, AGA→ATA) versus different context (TCT→TAT, AGA→ATA or AGA→ATA, TCT→TAT). This enrichment was not observed in the POLE-exowt (AA-3666) tumor. The blue bar in the 1-bp to 5-kb range of the POLE-wt only had 10 observations across the entire genome and may be a statistical outlier due to the limited number of observations. (See also Supplemental Fig. S5 for analysis of other patients.)

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 24: 1740-1750

Preprint Server