Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

POLE-exo* cancer mutations severely and differentially inhibit 3′→5′ exonuclease activity in a strand-specific manner. (A) The relative 3′-5′ exonuclease activities of the POLE cancer mutant variants were compared to those of the wild-type POLE enzyme (WTexo+). Reactions were carried out at 37°C and initiated by the addition of the enzyme. Aliquots were removed at the indicated times and resolved by 12% denaturing PAGE (see Methods for reaction details). Exonuclease activity was quantified and expressed as a percentage of wild-type activity (±SEM). (B) POLE cancer variants selectively affect specific replication errors in vitro. Error rates for each of the 12 possible individual base pair substitutions were calculated using a lacZ forward mutation assay as described by Bebenek and Kunkel (1995) and Korona et al. (2011). (WT) A previously characterized exonuclease-inactivating mutant (D275A/E277A). (C) POLE-exo* P286R exonuclease mutants exhibit a preference for TCT→TAT mutations in a cell-free reaction. Purified POLE containing the P286R substitution, three equally spaced oligonucleotide primers, and an M13mp2 single-stranded DNA template were used to generate a sequence product that was directly sequenced using Illumina paired end protocol. In the resulting collection of sequenced POLE replication errors, the count of TCT→TAT mutations is higher than the count of the complementary AGA→ATA mutations. (See also Supplemental Fig. S3.)

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 24: 1740-1750

Preprint Server