Temporal mapping of CEBPA and CEBPB binding during liver regeneration reveals dynamic occupancy and specific regulatory codes for homeostatic and cell cycle gene batteries

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Two modes of EGR1 cobinding at A and C cluster regions. (A) Bar diagram displaying overlap between peaks defined by EGR1 binding (24 h or 36 h, yellow bars) and CEBP binding. A or C cluster CEBP peak overlaps are shown (white numbers indicate proportions) with P-values of hypergeometric tests (Fisher's one-tailed) of similarity. (B) Diagram showing the distribution of distances between CEBP peak summits and the closest EGR1 (36-h) peak. A (gray) and C (blue) cluster peaks and a randomly distributed set (dashed line) are included. (C) CEBP and EGR1 ChIP read coverage and PWM hit tracks from representative A (top panels) and C (bottom panels) cluster regions. Vertical red bars indicate CEBP and EGR1 PWM hits; height of bars identity score; and transparent black bars show position of peak summits. (D) EGR1-ChIP using livers of mice deficient for Cebpb and wild-type livers. (Y-axis) Ratio of enrichment for Cebpb-null versus wild-type experiments. EGR1 bound regions overlapping with CEPB A cluster (gray) and C cluster (blue) peaks are shown. N = 3–4. Error bars, SEM. (**) P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed. For gene names, see Supplemental Table S10.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 23: 592-603

Preprint Server