Highly active zinc-finger nucleases by extended modular assembly

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

An analysis of affinity, specificity, and cytotoxicity. (A) EMSA was used to determine the affinity of CS2-1 three- and five-finger arrays for their specific (cognate) target as well as a nontarget (e.g., the L3 array on the R3 binding site). A large ratio of nontarget:specific binding is an indicator of good specificity. (B) In vitro binding specificity was also determined using the Bind-n-Seq target site selection assay (Zykovich et al. 2009). The binding preference of CS2-1-L3 appears to differ from the intended target site at three positions (red boxes). (C) Cytotoxicity was assessed as a decrease in the percentage of ZFN-expressing cells on day 5 compared to day 1. To follow only those cells expressing nuclease, a GFP expression vector was cotransfected with the indicated ZFN expression vectors. (GFP) Cells cotransfected with GFP and empty ZFN vector as a positive control. (GZF3-wt) A nuclease known to be cytotoxic (Szczepek et al. 2007) as a negative control. (Error bars) The standard deviation of normalized duplicates from at least two experiments. (*) P < 0.00001 compared to the GFP-only positive control based on a one-tailed homoscedastic t-test. (D) Cleavage activity is a summary of the SSA data from other figures and is shown here for reference.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 23: 530-538

Preprint Server