Analysis and correction of crosstalk effects in pathway analysis

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 9.
Figure 9.

A comparison of the classical overrepresentation analysis (A) with the crosstalk matrix analysis proposed here (B). (A) The standard overrepresentation approach contingency table: ni + mi and n + m represent, respectively, the number of genes belonging to pathway Pi and the total number of genes. ni and n represent, respectively, the number of differentially expressed genes belonging to pathway Pi and the total number of DE genes. (B) Contingency table for the overrepresentation approach, taking into account the overlap between pairs of pathways; Pi\j represents the set of elements in Pi excluding the intersection with Pj; with the notations ni\j + mi\j we represent the total number of genes that are in pathway Pi but not in pathway Pj, and with ni\j the number of DE genes that are in pathway Pi but not in pathway Pj.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 23: 1885-1893

Preprint Server