De novo DNA demethylation and noncoding transcription define active intergenic regulatory elements

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

iHMRs are conserved in methylation state and sequence, and are enriched for human population variation in methylation levels. (A) Cell-type-specific hypomethylation is conserved between human and chimp. Overlap between human B cell–specific or shared HMRs with HMRs in different chimpanzee cell types. (B) Intergenic HMRs shared between human and chimp are also more conserved at the sequence level. (C) Enhancer-like iHMRs are more variable between human and chimp. Barplots show the percentage of B cell iHMRs of different classes that overlap a chimp B cell iHMR. (D) Conservation of the TATA motif at enhancer-like iHMRs predicts conservation of hypomethylation. Barplots show the percentage of human iHMRs (containing the TATA motif) shared with chimp for (left) transcribed, enhancer-like iHMRs and (right) CTCF iHMRs, depending on whether the TATA motif is conserved in chimp. (E) Methylation is more variable at enhancer-like iHMRs in the human population. Barplots show the fraction of probed loci in different HMR classes at which methylation levels vary significantly between whole-blood samples from individuals (see Methods). (F) iHMRs that are conserved with chimp are also less variable in methylation level between human individuals.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 23: 1601-1614

Preprint Server