Genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNA stability

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Effect of lncRNA features on stability. (A) Comparison of the stability of intronic versus intergenic and cis-antisense lncRNAs. Box-and-whisker plot. (Whiskers) 1st–99th percentile, with individual transcripts outside this shown as dots. (Box) 25th–75th percentile. Difference calculated using one-way ANOVA with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test and Dunn's post-test to compare individual annotations. (B) Frequency distribution showing the fraction of lncRNA transcripts in 2-h bins. Plotted points are at the center of the 2-h bin. Only time points with 1% or more of transcripts are plotted. (C) Percentage of unstable (half-life under 2 h) lncRNA intergenic, cis-antisense, and intronic transcripts. Significant difference calculated using χ2 test. (D) Comparison of the stability of all lncRNA genomic classifications. Box-and-whisker plot. To focus on the center of the distribution, whiskers show 10th–90th percentile, with individual transcripts outside this shown as dots, and only half-lives between 0.2 h and 20 h are shown. Significant differences found between stability of classes using one-way ANOVA with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test and Dunn's post-test to compare individual annotations. (*) Level of significance common to all comparisons. (E) Comparison of the stability of localized transcripts. Box-and-whisker plot and statistical testing as per A. (F) Frequency distribution showing the fraction of nuclear, cytoplasmic, and nonenriched transcripts in 2-h bins. Plotted points as per B. (*) P < 0.05, (**) P < 0.01, (***) P < 0.001.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 22: 885-898

Preprint Server