Putting genetic interactions in context through a global modular decomposition

  1. Chad L. Myers1,8
  1. 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA;
  2. 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  3. 3The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  4. 4Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona 08003, Spain;
  5. 5Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  6. 6Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  7. 7Plant and Molecular Biology Department, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102, USA

    Abstract

    Genetic interactions provide a powerful perspective into gene function, but our knowledge of the specific mechanisms that give rise to these interactions is still relatively limited. The availability of a global genetic interaction map in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, covering ∼30% of all possible double mutant combinations, provides an unprecedented opportunity for an unbiased assessment of the native structure within genetic interaction networks and how it relates to gene function and modular organization. Toward this end, we developed a data mining approach to exhaustively discover all block structures within this network, which allowed for its complete modular decomposition. The resulting modular structures revealed the importance of the context of individual genetic interactions in their interpretation and revealed distinct trends among genetic interaction hubs as well as insights into the evolution of duplicate genes. Block membership also revealed a surprising degree of multifunctionality across the yeast genome and enabled a novel association of VIP1 and IPK1 with DNA replication and repair, which is supported by experimental evidence. Our modular decomposition also provided a basis for testing the between-pathway model of negative genetic interactions and within-pathway model of positive genetic interactions. While we find that most modular structures involving negative genetic interactions fit the between-pathway model, we found that current models for positive genetic interactions fail to explain 80% of the modular structures detected. We also find differences between the modular structures of essential and nonessential genes.

    Footnotes

    • Received October 28, 2010.
    • Accepted May 24, 2011.
    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server