Genome-wide mapping of SMAD target genes reveals the role of BMP signaling in embryonic stem cell fate determination

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

SMAD1 and SMAD4 are largely involved in differentiation regulation rather than direct self-renewal maintenance. (A) Knockdown of Smad1 or Smad4 has no effect on the expression of self-renewal markers. Total RNA extracted from R1 cells expressing Smad shRNA or control shRNA constructs were subjected to RT-PCR. Gapdh served as a loading control. (B) No difference of the POU5F1 protein levels in R1 cells expressing Smad shRNA or control shRNA. Protein expression was examined by immunoblotting. Tubulin served as a loading control. (C) Phosphorylation of SMAD1/5 is enhanced during EB formation. EB was formed in serum-free KO-SR culture conditions, and total proteins were collected at indicated times and subjected for anti-phopho-SMAD1/5 and anti-SMAD1/5 immunoblotting. GAPDH served as a loading control. (D) Smad knockdown alters the expression profile of germ layer markers. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed to examine marker expression in Smad shRNA and control shRNA cells during the course of EB differentiation. The significance of expression was analyzed by Student's t-test, and data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05). This experiment was repeated three times and similar results were obtained.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 20: 36-44

Preprint Server