High-resolution analysis of epigenetic changes associated with X inactivation

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Overview of the epigenetic landscape, as well as gene expression within and centered around the Xic. A screen shot from the UCSC Genome Browser showing the distribution of the ChIP-chip profiles across a 100 kb region of mouse chromosome X in mouse embryonic cells (UCSC Mouse [mm9], July 2007; chromosome X genomic coordinates 100.615–100.715 Mb). Expression was determined by hybridizing polyA RNA to the tiling array. Y-axis, log2 ChIP/input ratio or log2 cDNA/input ratio; x-axis, 50 bp oligonucleotides from sequence included on the NimbleGen mouse chromosome X tiling array. The quantification, as shown below the profiles, was obtained from the XT67E1 ChIP-seq experiments as described later. For quantifications, ChIP-seq tags were counted within the indicated regions. For the E14 cells, the tags are obtained from one X chromosome, while in XT67E1 cells they are obtained from both X chromosomes. (A) Overview of the TsixXist interplay. Tsix and Xist noncoding RNAs, and direction of transcription, are indicated below all profiles. (B) Enlargement of the expression profiles of the LF2 cells, showing a clear correlation between the expression signal and the Xist exons after 4-d atRA treatment or 10-d EB formation. The arrows shown for the undifferentiated LF2 cells indicate PCR amplicons used for RT-qPCR validation (Supplemental Fig. S1b).

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 19: 1361-1373

Preprint Server