Two-parameter characterization of chromosome-scale recombination rate

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

The genetic length (in centimorgans, cM) vs. physical length (in megabases, Mb) plotted for five genomes. (A) (×) Mouse (Mus musculus) and (○) rat (Rattus norvegicus). [Data source: Table 1 of Jensen-Seaman et al. 2004.] The regression lines are: y = 15.62 + 0.44x (mouse), y = 22.49 + 0.43x (rat). (B) Chicken (Gallus gallus). [Source: old data (year 2004, ○) are from Supplemental Table S2 of the International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004); new data (year 2008, ×) are from Table 1 of Groenen et al. (2009).] The regression line is y = 34.68 + 2.79x (old data) and y = 34.23 + 2.04x (new data). (C) Honeybee (Apis mellifera). [Source: Table 2 of Beye et al. 2006.] The regression line is y = −4.22 + 23.49x. (D) Budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). [Source: http://downloads.yeastgenome.org/chromosomal_feature/SGD_features.tab.] The regression line is y = 49.12 + 287.74x.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 19: 2300-2307

Preprint Server