Pseudogenes in the ENCODE regions: Consensus annotation, analysis of transcription, and evolution

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Comparison of results from five methods of pseudogene identification. (A) Pseudogenes annotated by a method were binned into groups based on the number of methods that recognized them as pseudogenes. In this scheme, method-specific pseudogenes were labeled as (found by) “1” method. (B) A four-way comparison of pseudogenes identified by HAVANA, PseudoPipe, retroFinder, and pseudoFinder. Note: one pseudogene could overlap more than one pseudogene from other method(s).

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 17: 839-851

Preprint Server



Current Issue

  1. March 2026, 36 (3)
  1. Current Issue
  1. Alert me to new issues of Genome Research