Design optimization methods for genomic DNA tiling arrays

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Representation of repetitive and non-repetitive sequences in genomic DNA. (A) Repetitive (gray) and non-repetitive (blue) segments are oriented vertically; the length of each subsequence is reflected by the height of the corresponding bar. (B) Repeat-masked region of human chromosome 10 showing alternating segments of repetitive and non-repetitive DNA. The high level of sequence fragmentation is clear, as is the wide range of sizes in both repetitive and non-repetitive segments. The horizontal line (red) indicates a segment length of 300 bp; a large number of non-repetitive sequences below this threshold are omitted when using naive tiling methods that simply avoid repeats. (C) Finer-resolution window of chromosome 10 before and after optimal sequence tiling. (Blue bars) Non-repetitive sequence that is covered in each case, (red bars) non-repetitive sequence that is lost. Non-repetitive sequences below the minimum size threshold are omitted when the sequence is tiled in a straightforward manner (left panel). Many of these are recovered after optimal tiling methods are applied (right panel). Note that a small number of repetitive nucleotides (short blue bars extending below the horizontal line) are included in the tile path to increase the overall sequence coverage.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 16: 271-281

Preprint Server