Percentage of bootstraps over 3-Mb windows for which recombination remains a stronger predictor of the residuals of human diversity with errors added than chimpanzee diversity after regression on divergence
|
|
P (βmin-human ≥ βchimp) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| λ
|
Clint diversity
|
Central-Western diversity
|
|
| 1/100,000 | 99.24 | 99.19 | |
| 1/50,000 | 93.33 | 99.65 | |
| 1/25,000 | 71.28 | 98.45 | |
| 1/10,000
|
0.10
|
29.20
|
|
-
Chimpanzee diversity estimates come from two sources: the comparison of two chromosomes of Clint and comparisons between Central and Western chimpanzees (see Methods). λ reflects the mean probability of an incorrect base call, which was estimated to be ~1/100,000 (see Methods). As can be seen, only by adding unrealistic levels of error does the relationship of human diversity and recombination become as weak as the relationship of chimpanzee diversity and recombination.
