Mass spectrometry of the M. smegmatis proteome: Protein expression levels correlate with function, operons, and codon bias

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

A comparison of the proteomes of exponential and stationary-phase cells. (A) The overlap of identified proteins in exponential and stationary phases (left chart), showing the functions of proteins specific to exponential phase (top right chart) or stationary phase (bottom right chart). For clarity, proteins with uncharacterized functions are excluded from the pie charts. (B) COG functions for the proteins differentially expressed in exponential and stationary phases. For the proteins in each COG category, we plot the mean difference in expression level, calculated as mean (Formula), where Nexp,i and Nstat,i are the number of observations of protein i in exponential and stationary phase, respectively. The factor of Formula is introduced to scale the number of stationary-phase experiments to match the number of exponential phase experiments. Proteins of cell growth (translation, replication, etc.) are highly induced in exponential phase, while proteins of transport and energy production are highly induced in stationary phase. (PTM) Post-translational modification. (C) A 2D histogram plots the distribution of protein abundances and differential expression between stationary- and exponential-phase cells. The bulk of proteins lie on the diagonal (no differential expression); off-diagonal proteins are differentially expressed to varying degrees.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 15: 1118-1126

Preprint Server