Table 3.
Effect of ABCG2(2) on the breeding values of the daughters of the heterozygous sires and QTL effects derived from the animal model analyses
|
|
|
|
Quantitative traits |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis |
Genotypea |
Number of cows |
Kg milk |
Kg fat |
Kg protein |
% Fat |
% Protein |
||||
| Class effectsb | -/- | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| +/- | 328 | -185 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.059 | 0.065 | |||||
| +/+ | 264 | -432**** | 4.2** | 3.3** | 0.169**** | 0.145**** | |||||
| % Dominancec | 14.3 | 80.9 | 27.3 | 30.2* | 17.2* | ||||||
| Regressiond | 670 | -226**** | 2.6** | 1.8** | 0.093**** | 0.076**** | |||||
| Animal modeld
|
|
|
-597
|
2.2
|
1.3
|
0.225
|
0.193
|
||||
-
Significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
-
↵a 581S was denoted the “-” QTL allele; Y581 was denoted the “+” QTL allele
-
↵b Significance of the class effect is indicated in the +/+ row. Effects are computed relative to the -/- homozygote
-
↵c Relative to the -/- homozygote
-
↵d Allele substitution effects assuming additivity
