Table 3.
Success rate in validating expression from singleton and paired CAGS
|
|
No. of CAGS |
Fraction of CAGS expressed |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAGS category |
Tested |
With high quality sequences |
Experimental sequence matching target |
Total |
Truly intergenica |
Perigenica |
||||
| Singleton | 109 | 69 | 20 | 18.3% (20/109) | 20.6% (15/73) | 13.9% (5/36) | ||||
| Pair
|
83
|
64
|
38
|
45.8% (38/83)
|
47.3% (26/55)
|
42.9% (12/28)
|
||||
-
↵a The original set of intergenic CAGS was further divided into those close to but not intersecting existing gene annotations (perigenic) and those sufficiently removed from existing annotations to be likely novel conserved structures (see text for details)
