Table 6.
Significance test for differences in SABmark performance
|
|
Align-M |
DIALIGN |
CLUSTALW |
MAFFT |
T-Coffee |
MUSCLE |
ProbCons |
ProbCons-ext |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Align-M | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | |
| DIALIGN | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | |
| CLUSTALW | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −0.02 | −0.01 | −7.5 × 10−6 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | |
| MAFFT | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | +(0.083) | −1.5 × 10−5 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | |
| T-Coffee | −<10−10 | −2.5 × 10−3 | +<10−10 | +<10−10 | −0.052 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | |
| MUSCLE | −<10−10 | −1.2 × 10−7 | +<10−10 | +1.2 × 10−4 | −1.5 × 10−5 | −<10−10 | −<10−10 | |
| ProbCons | −<10−10 | +<10−10 | +<10−10 | +<10−10 | +<10−10 | +<10−10 | +6.4 × 10−4 | |
| ProbCons-ext
|
−<10−10
|
+<10−10
|
+<10−10
|
+<10−10
|
+<10−10
|
+<10−10
|
+(0.31)
|
|
-
Entries show the p-value indicating the significance of a difference in performance between two alignment methods as measured using a Friedman rank test. Nonitalicized values above the diagonal were calculated using fD (SP) scores on all alignments, whereas italicized values were computed using fM scores. (+) Method on the left had lower average rank (better performance); (−) Method on the left had higher average rank (worse performance); parentheses denote (nonsignificant) p-values >0.05.
