Table 4.
Significance test for differences in PREFAB performance
|
|
DIALIGN |
CLUSTALW |
T-Coffee |
MUSCLE |
MAFFT |
ProbCons |
ProbCons-ext |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIALIGN | −1.06 × 10−9 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | |
| CLUSTALW | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | ||
| T-Coffee | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | |||
| MUSCLE | +2.3 × 10−9 | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | ||||
| MAFFT | − <10−10 | − <10−10 | |||||
| ProbCons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−0.031
|
-
Entries show the p-value indicating the significance of a difference in performence between two alignment methods as measured using a Friedman rank test. Values were calculated using Q (SP) scores on all alignments. (+) Method on the left had lower average rank (better performance); (−) Method on the left had higher average rank (worse performance); parentheses denote (nonsignificant) p-values >0.05.
