Incongruent Patterns of Local and Global Genome Size Evolution in Cotton

  1. Corrinne E. Grover1,
  2. HyeRan Kim2,
  3. Rod A. Wing2,
  4. Andrew H. Paterson3, and
  5. Jonathan F. Wendel1,4
  1. 1 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
  2. 2 Arizona Genomics Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
  3. 3 Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

Abstract

Genome sizes in plants vary over several orders of magnitude, reflecting a combination of differentially acting local and global forces such as biases in indel accumulation and transposable element proliferation or removal. To gain insight into the relative role of these and other forces, ∼105 kb of contiguous sequence surrounding the cellulose synthase gene CesA1 was compared for the two coresident genomes (AT and DT) of the allopolyploid cotton species, Gossypium hirsutum. These two genomes differ approximately twofold in size, having diverged from a common ancestor ∼5–10 million years ago (Mya) and been reunited in the same nucleus at the time of polyploid formation, ∼1–2 Mya. Gene content, order, and spacing are largely conserved between the two genomes, although a few transposable elements and a single cpDNA fragment distinguish the two homoeologs. Sequence conservation is high in both intergenic and genic regions, with 14 conserved genes detected in both genomes yielding a density of 1 gene every 7.5 kb. In contrast to the twofold overall difference in DNA content, no disparity in size was observed for this 105-kb region, and 555 indels were detected that distinguish the two homoeologous BACs, approximately equally distributed between AT and DT in number and aggregate size. The data demonstrate that genome size evolution at this phylogenetic scale is not primarily caused by mechanisms that operate uniformly across different genomic regions and components; instead, the twofold overall difference in DNA content must reflect locally operating forces between gene islands or in largely gene-free regions.

Footnotes

  • [The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. AY632359 and AY632360.]

  • Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.2673204. Article published online ahead of print in July 2004.

  • 4 Corresponding author. E-MAIL jfw{at}iastate.edu; FAX (515) 294-1337.

    • Accepted May 26, 2004.
    • Received April 12, 2004.
| Table of Contents

Preprint Server