Genomic Regionality in Rates of Evolution Is Not Explained by Clustering of Genes of Comparable Expression Profile

Table 2.

Difference of Synonymous Substitution Rate (K4) Between Housekeeping and Tissue-Specific Genes



Human—mouse

Mouse—rat
Breadth measure
Housekeepinga
Tissue-specifica
ΔK4b
Pc
N
Housekeepinga
Tissue-specifica
ΔK4b
Pc
N
K4
    EST 0.387 0.502 0.115 0.00077 121 0.161 0.18 0.019 0.00067 463
    SAGE 0.411 0.475 0.064 0.0026 394 0.157 0.175 0.018 <0.00001 1928
    Microarray 0.387 0.501 0.114 0.00005 103 0.165 0.172 0.007 0.057 789
K4 residuals from regression on KA
    EST 0.024 0.055 0.047 121 -0.031 0.0099 0.0012 0.41 463 0.0087
    SAGE -0.002 0 0.51 394 -0.002 0.0092 0.0065 0.032 1928 0.0027
    Microarray
0.026
0.048
0.05
103
-0.022
0.0067
-0.0012
0.61
789
0.0079
  • a Average K4 or average residuals of K4. Residuals were calculated from expected K4 values, which were predicted from linear regression of log(K4) on log(KA) including all genes. Genes were classified as housekeeping/tissue-specific if supported by experiments in both human and mouse for the human—mouse comparison, and by experiments in mouse for the mouse—rat comparison. Only non-disparate gene pairs were included.

  • b Difference in K4 (or residuals) between tissue-specific and housekeeping averages.

  • c Probability of finding an equal or greater difference in 100,000 randomized genomes.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 14: 1002-1013

Preprint Server