Analyses of LTR-Retrotransposon Structures Reveal Recent and Rapid Genomic DNA Loss in Rice

Table 3.

Statistical Significance of the Association of Short Direct Repeats (DRs) With Deletions






No. of repeats in randomization test (Test 1)



No. of matching bases in randomization test (Test 2)
LTR Retrotransposon Family
No. of elements
No. of deletions
No. of deletions flanked by DRsa
Mean ± SD (max.)
P
No. of bases in repeats
No. of bases matching in 5′ and 3′ sequences
Mean ± SD (max.)
P
Family I (Osr4) 20 15 14 0.44 ± 0.64 (4) 6 × 10-10 54 51 14.9 ± 3.2 (26) 4 × 10-9
Family X (Osr1) 20 9 8 0.35 ± 0.56 (3) 1 × 10-7 38 38 10.2 ± 2.28 (19) 7 × 10-7
Family XI (Osr41) 20 47 41 1.23 ± 1.09 (6) 8 × 10-10 207 193 52.7 ± 6.2 (74) 9 × 10-29
Osr8 10 16 13 0.26 ± 0.47 (2) 2 × 10-14 63 63 15.0 ± 4.0 (29) 7 × 10-8
Osr30
10
12
10
0.28 ± 0.50 (3)
7 × 10-11
44
43
11.3 ± 3.7 (23)
5 × 10-5
  • a A short direct repeat (DR) was considered as starting from the deletion breakpoint and was extended if the bases in the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences matched, or if a single-base mismatch was followed by at least two matching bases. The DR was considered as stopping where a mismatch was followed by zero or one matching base

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 14: 860-869

Preprint Server