Integration of the Rat Recombination and EST Maps in the Rat Genomic Sequence and Comparative Mapping Analysis With the Mouse Genome

Table 1B.

Description of In Silico Assignment of Microsatellite Markers to the Rat Genome


RNO

Markersa

e-PCR mappinga

Average spacing (kb)b

Inconsistencies (%)c
   1 1149 834 293.7 26 (3.1%)
   2 948 632 371.0 6 (0.9%)
   3 675 497 303.7 10 (2.0%)
   4 692 470 352.9 2 (0.4%)
   5 694 475 323.6 3 (0.6%)
   6 540 403 348.2 14 (3.5%)
   7 573 414 316.6 7 (1.7%)
   8 580 425 277.0 12 (2.8%)
   9 453 310 335.3 5 (1.6%)
10 686 480 215.4 5 (1.0%)
11 284 196 397.3 3 (1.5%)
12 307 205 215.0 4 (2.0%)
13 476 316 311.9 4 (1.3%)
14 355 258 377.8 3 (1.2%)
15 381 266 375.9 4 (1.5%)
16 315 223 372.8 2 (0.9%)
17 416 311 281.2 2 (0.6%)
18 325 234 342.5 2 (0.9%)
19 253 172 297.6 0 (0.0%)
20 194 123 389.4 1 (0.8%)
Unassigned 1289 853
Total
11,585
8097
270.4
115 (1.4%)
  • a The number of markers used for e-PCR mapping to the rat genome sequence includes all available microsatellites, including 1289 markers previously defined by a D-Number nomenclature (e.g., D0Got, D0Mco) that could not be assigned to a rat chromosome by genetic or RH mapping

  • b The average distance between markers in the genomic sequence was calculated with the chromosome length determined in the June 2003 rat genome assembly, and includes above-described markers that are only mapped by e-PCR

  • c Details of markers that are assigned to different chromosomes by linkage or RH mapping and e-PCR are available in our data repository (http://www.well.ox.ac.uk/rat_mapping_resources)

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 14: 758-765

Preprint Server