Table 5.
Comparison Between CDS From GSLT-Deduced and Annotated Gene Models
|
|
Annotated gene models with a CDS reduction |
Annotated genes with no CDS reduction |
Annotated genes Identical to GSLT models |
Annotated genes with internal modifications proposed by GSLT models |
Annotated genes with a proposed extension |
Annotated genes with extension including additional exons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 388 | 4904 | 142 | 178 | 107 | |
| 5558 | (7%) | 5170 | (94.9%) | (2.7%) | (3.4%) | (2.1%) |
| Group B | 306 | 890 | 298 | 425 | 272 | |
| 1931
|
(15.8%)
|
1625
|
(54.8%)
|
(18.3%)
|
(26.1%)
|
(16.7%)
|
-
The sum is over 100%, as an annotated gene can belong to more than one category.
