Mean number of orthologs (reciprocal best matches, RBM) shared among genomes from X different bacterial phyla (12 currently available*).
|
|
Mean number shared (genome combinationsa) |
n |
Mean number shared (phylum combinationsb) |
n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X = 2 | 609 (sd 267) [169-1721] | 6.02e+3 | 599 (sd 143) [326-861] | 66 |
| X = 3 | 362 (sd 128) [132-835] | 1.30e+5 | 380 (sd 76) [237-523] | 220 |
| X = 4 | 272 (sd 82) [118-596] | 1.52e+6 | 294 (sd 52) [201-419] | 495 |
| X = 5 | 225 (sd 58) [109-477] | 1.04e+7 | 246 (sd 39) [182-360] | 792 |
| X = 6 | 197 (sd 44) [107-398] | 4.34e+7 | 215 (sd 29) [168-315] | 924 |
| X = 7 | 179 (sd 34) [105-357] | 1.14e+8 | 193 (sd 22) [157-280] | 792 |
| X = 8 | 166 (sd 28) [103-324] | 1.92e+8 | 177 (sd 17) [151-244] | 495 |
| X = 9 | 157 (sd 23) [102-297] | 2.06e+8 | 164 (sd 12) [145-217] | 220 |
| X = 10 | 149 (sd 20) [101-274] | 1.37e+8 | 153 (sd 8) [142-185] | 66 |
| X = 11 | 143 (sd 17) [100-253] | 5.10e+7 | 145 (sd 5) [139-155] | 12 |
| X = 12
|
138 (sd 15) [100-178]
|
8.18e+6
|
138 (sd 0) [138-138]
|
1
|
-
↵* Bacterial phyla for which sequenced genomes were available at the time of constructing this table are as follows: Aquificales (1), Bacteroidetes (2), Chlamydiales (7), Chlorobi (1), Cyanobacteria (8), Thermus/Deinococcus group (1), High-G+C Firmicutes (12), Low-G+C Firmicutes (35), Planctomycetes (1), Proteobacteria (58), Spirochaetes (3), Thermotogales (1). (Fusobacterium nucleatum is included within the Low-G+C Firmicutes)
-
↵a Computed as a global mean of all individual combinations of X genomes from X phyla
-
↵b Means are first computed for each phylum combination (e.g., from the 174 genome combinations of Proteobacteria versus Spirochaetes), then a mean of these phylum means is computed. E.g., for X = 3, a genome from one phylum is compared with a genome from a second phylum and with a genome from a third phylum. The mean number of RBM for all such combinations is reported. (sd) Standard deviation, (square brackets) minimum and maximum values (n), number of combinations. See Figure 3 for a graphical representation of the phylum combinations data
