The molecular structure of the DNA fragments eliminated during chromatin diminution in Cyclops kolensis

  1. Sergei Degtyarev2,
  2. Tatiana Boykova1,3,
  3. Andrei Grishanin2,
  4. Stepan Belyakin1,
  5. Nikolai Rubtsov1,
  6. Tatiana Karamysheva1,
  7. Grigory Makarevich4,
  8. Alexei Akifyev2, and
  9. Igor Zhimulev1,5
  1. 1 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
  2. 2 Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
  3. 3 Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom
  4. 4 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA

Abstract

Presumptive somatic cells of the copepod Cyclops kolensis specifically eliminate a large fraction of their genome by the process of chromatin diminution. The eliminated DNA (eDNA) remains only in the germline cells. Very little is known about the nature of the sequences eliminated from somatic cells. We cloned a fraction of the eDNA and sequenced 90 clones that total 32 kb. The following organizational patterns were demonstrated for the eDNA sequences. All do not contain open reading frames. Each fragment contains 1–3 families of short repeats (10–30 bp) highly homologous within families (87%–100%). Most repeats are separated by spacers up to 50 bp long. Homologous regions were found between fragments, motifs from 15–300 bp in length. Among fragments there occur groups in which the same motifs are ordered in the same fashion. However, spacers between the motifs differ in length and nucleotide composition. Ubiquitous motifs (those occurring in all fragments) were identified. Analysis of motifs revealed submotifs, each occurring within several motifs. Thus, motifs may be regarded as mosaic structures composed of submotifs (short repeats). Taken together, the results provide evidence of a high organizational ordering of the DNA sequences restricted to the germline. With this in mind, it appears incorrect to refer to this part of the genome as junk. Moreover, eDNA is redundant for only the somatic cells—its function is to be sought in germline cells.

Footnotes

  • [Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. AY533039–AY533099.]

  • Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.2794604.

  • 5 Corresponding author. E-mail zhimulev{at}bionet.nsc.ru, fax 7-3832-33-12-78.

    • Accepted August 16, 2004.
    • Received April 21, 2004.
| Table of Contents

Preprint Server