Table 2.
Classification of Variants According to the Distribution of the Minor Allele
|
Minor allele present in |
# of variants |
% of total variants ± SD |
% of M. musculus variants ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPRET/EiJ | 144 | 15.7 ± 1.2 | n. a. |
| PANCEVO/EiJ | 121 | 13.1 ± 1.1 | n. a. |
| SPRET/EiJ and PANCEVO/EiJ | 71 | 7.7 ± 0.9 | n. a. |
| M. musculus and SPRET/EiJ | 34 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 5.8 ± 1.0 |
| M. musculus and PANCEVO/EiJ | 41 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 1.1 |
| M. musculus | 507 | 55.5 ± 1.6 | 87.1 ± 1.4 |
| Wild derived | 301 | 32.9 ± 1.6 | 51.8 ± 2.1 |
| Wild derived and Classical | 185 | 20.2 ± 1.3 | 31.8 ± 1.9 |
| Classical
|
21
|
2.9 ± 1.3
|
3.6 ± 0.8
|
-
The Table shows 918 insertion/deletion and substitution variants identified in this study classified according to the distribution of the minor allele among three Mus species into six mutually exclusive classes. Variants found exclusively in M. musculus are further subdivided depending on whether the minor allele is found in wild-derived strains only, in classical strains only, or in both types of strains. (n. a.) Not applicable.
