Coelomata and Not Ecdysozoa: Evidence From Genome-Wide Phylogenetic Analysis

Table 3.

Distribution of the Metazoan Tree Topologies Obtained With Four Tree Construction Methods for 507 KOGs


Method

C

E

W


Gap/ML 175 (53%) 114 (35%) 39 (12%) 179 (35%)
Gap/FI 216 (67%) 68 (21%) 40 (12%) 183 (36%)
Block/ML 152 (53%) 95 (33%) 39 (14%) 221 (44%)
Block/FI 186 (65%) 61 (21%) 38 (13%) 222 (44%)
combined (3 of 4) 139 (69%) 48 (24%) 15 (7%) 305 (60%)
combined (4 of 4)
91 (72%)
28 (22%)
7 (6%)
381 (75%)
  • The number of KOGs is given for each combination of phylogenetic analysis strategy [Gap, gap exclusion mode; Block, block mode; ML, Maximum Likelihood (MOLPHY); FI, Fitch] and topology (C, coelomate; E, ecdysozoan; W, worm-human; ∼, poor tree, monophyly of Metazoa and/or Fungi not recovered). The numbers in parentheses show the percentage of the given topology among the acceptable trees (those with correctly recovered monophyly of the kingdoms) except for the last column (poor trees), in which the percentage of the entire six507 set is indicated.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 14: 29-36

Preprint Server