Table 3.
Mapping the PANTHER/X Ontology to GO
|
|
Map to equivalent GO categories |
Map to more general GO categories |
No match |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular function | ||||
| Overall | 160 (65.5%) | 64 (26.2%) | 20 (8.2%) | 244 |
| Level 1 categories | 20 (66.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | 6 (20.0%) | 30 |
| Level 2 categories | 91 (60.3%) | 49 (32.4%) | 11 (7.3%) | 151 |
| Level 3 categories | 49 (77.7%) | 11 (17.5%) | 3 (4.8%) | 63 |
| Biological process | ||||
| Overall | 167 (67.0%) | 66 (26.5%) | 16 (6.4%) | 249 |
| Level 1 categories | 23 (63.9%) | 4 (11.1%) | 9 (25.0%) | 36 |
| Level 2 categories | 95 (67.3%) | 39 (27.7%) | 7 (5.0%) | 141 |
| Level 3 categories
|
49 (68%)
|
23 (32%)
|
0.00%
|
72
|
-
For both molecular function and biological process, approximately two-thirds of the PANTHER/X terms can be mapped to an exactly equivalent term in GO, and approximately an additional one-quarter of PANTHER/X terms can be mapped to a GO term that is more general than the PANTHER/X term.
